PDA

View Full Version : NHL nears agreement



ihlemic10
07-07-2005, 07:13 AM
The Seattle Times posted this article today.

Players, league agree in principle to NHL contract
By Helene Elliott

The NHL and the players' association have agreed in principle on a new collective-bargaining agreement, sources familiar with the labor negotiations said yesterday.

The new deal will feature a hard salary cap linked to 54 percent of league revenue, a 24 percent rollback of existing contracts and qualifying offers, and a provision that will limit the salary of any single player to 20 percent of the team cap figure in any year, sources said.

The agreement, which is expected to be announced next week, also includes an NBA-style escrow provision under which 15 percent of each player's paycheck will go into an escrow account until revenue is calculated after each season. If league-wide spending on salaries exceeds 54 percent of revenue, the difference between the salaries paid and the negotiated percentage will be paid to teams from the escrow account. If teams spend less than 54 percent, the escrow money will revert to players.

Negotiators are estimating revenues will be $1.8 billion next season, down from $2.1 billion in 2002-03. The salary cap will be $37 million and won't include medical and dental benefits and pension payments.

The league also agreed to let players represent their homelands at the Turin Olympics next February and will take an 18-day break to accommodate players' travel and participation in the Games. The All-Star Game will be dropped that year.

A source also said each team will have an equal chance in the lottery for the No. 1 pick in this year's entry draft.

Overall, the agreement is a resounding victory for NHL commissioner Gary Bettman, who locked players out Sept. 15 in an effort to bring about sweeping economic changes and achieve cost certainty for owners. The average NHL salary rose from $730,000 in 1994-95 to $1.83 million in 2003-04. Bettman said revenue did not keep pace and that teams lost a collective $1 billion in the decade preceding the lockout.

The NHL will become the last of the major North American leagues to adopt salary controls.

The agreement will be presented to the 10-member NHL executive committee in New York on Monday, and the Board of Governors will rubber-stamp it late next week.

Players will debate and vote at a meeting that could be contentious; if they approve, a 10-day period will begin for teams to sign players they drafted in 2003 and other players on their reserve lists. The season probably would start in early to mid-October.

Kings president Tim Leiweke, a member of the NHL executive committee, declined to discuss specifics of the negotiations.

"I do think the union and the league have made a lot of progress," he said. "They're not there, but hopefully, they'll be there in the very near future."

The largest unresolved issue, a source said, is the disposition of contracts for the 2004-05 season. The NHLPA wants obligations for the 2004-05 season to be respected, and the NHL opposes that but might yield, a source said.

The new deal has no luxury tax but addresses revenue sharing through a complex formula under which the top 10 revenue-earning teams will give a percentage of their revenue to small-market teams at the conclusion of each season.

In another key change, players' performance bonuses will be restricted according to a standardized formula.

The_Vulk
07-07-2005, 08:48 PM
New CBA deal report jumping the gun (http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20050707_083635_1408)

Although a new CBA is imminent, reports stating a tentative deal has been reached are premature.

As Sportsnet reported Wednesday, it's expected the NHL and NHLPA are very close to announcing a deal in principle.

However, Ted Saskin speaking on behalf of the union says the L.A. Times story suggesting a tentative deal is in place is "too premature."

An NHL source described the article as "not even close to being accurate."
The LA Times broke the story.

With so many false hopes over the last year, waiting until they HAVE an agrement until saying anything is what they should have done from the start.

Only until the NHL and the PA say they have agreed (in principal) to a new CBA, and not until after BOTH side ratify the agreement will I be happy/believe it.

We have heard too many players saying that they might vote done the rumoured CBA because it is too much. To that I have to say, if you would have negotiated in good FAITH from the begining... and had addressed these problems in the last CBA...