PDA

View Full Version : NHL and NHLPA agree on new CBA!



Chipper
07-13-2005, 01:43 PM
The NHL and NHL Players' Association finally announced a deal to end the lockout Wednesday, meaning the league could be back in business as early as next week pending ratification by both sides.

The "agreement in principle" came after the two sides met for more than 24 hours straight in New York, the culmination of 10 consecutive days of talks.

The process is not quite over. The players' rank and file and the owners have to ratify the agreement. That is expected some time next week.

Both sides are expected to approve the deal, paving the way for the NHL to reopen for business this fall.

The NHL and NHLPA said details of the agreement will not be released pending ratification.

But it's believed the six-year deal contains the following:

- A 24 per cent salary rollback on all existing contracts;

- The upper limit on the salary cap for 2005-06 will be $39 million US while the minimum floor will be at $21.5 million, based on projected revenues of $1.8 billion;

- A percentage of salaries will be put into escrow until the new salary cap can be calculated at the end of each season;

- No player can earn more than 20 per cent of the team cap, which for 2005-06 means no player can earn more than $7.4 million;

The game will return looking drastically different both on and off the ice. A vastly different and complicated collective bargaining agreement has given owners their long-desired "cost certainty."

Teams will come back looking vastly different as well. Mass player movement is expected with a high number of free agents on the market as well as several high-paid players expected to get bought out so teams can fit under the cap.

On the ice, major rules changes are being examined which will hopefully open up the game and create more excitement, likely including the reduction in the size of goalie equipment, allowing the two-line pass, and the penalty shootout to decide tie games during the regular season.

And there's much work ahead to lure back bitter fans and an apathetic corporate community.

A source also said Wednesday that the belated 2005 NHL entry draft will be held in Ottawa on Saturday, July 30, although it will be a much smaller event with only the very top prospects invited, including Sidney Crosby, the consensus No. 1 pick.

The draft lottery is slated to be conducted during a board of governors meeting next week in New York where the owners are also expected to ratify the deal.
In the end, the players caved in on an issue they swore they never would: the salary cap.

It's clear this isn't a deal NHLPA executive director Bob Goodenow was in favour of but he went along with it, respecting the wishes of union president Trevor Linden and the rest of the players' executive committee.

It's been a long and tumultuous road towards a resolution. From the first labour meeting in January 2003 to the last on Wednesday, both sides met 82 times over two and a half years before finally agreeing on a new deal.

The lockout wiped out the entire 2004-05 season, including all 1,230 regular-season games, denying hockey fans a Stanley Cup champion for the first time since a flu epidemic cancelled the 1919 final. The NHL became the first major professional league in North America to loose a season from beginning to end because of labour strife.

Once commissioner Gary Bettman announced the season cancelled Feb. 16, both sides returned to the negotiating table March 11 in the first of 44 meetings aimed at making sure the 2005-06 season wouldn't be delayed.

The two sides met every single week starting in early May and didn't let up until the end, cramming in long days in the final six weeks in an effort to finally get it done.

A number of player agents are angry with Goodenow, feeling betrayed by his strategy from the get-go.

But while the owners appear to have scored a one-sided victory, it remains to be seen at what cost. The damage to the industry from not having any hockey played for a year may have both sides singing the blues.


© The Canadian Press 2005

Jovorock
07-13-2005, 02:31 PM
I think it's fair for both sides, if revenue goes up then the players will have more money in their jeans. I bet they are all kicking themselves in the ass for not taking the 45million cap at the deadline in February. That had no link to revenue and there would of been a Stanley Cup. :confused:

Beaner
07-13-2005, 03:40 PM
Now they can truely have a partnership. If the players want more cash then they better make sure that its an entertaiing product on the ice to put bums in seats.


Now onto the Draft speculation and which WHL teams are going to be losing which players to their NHL clubs.

WHEATMAN
07-13-2005, 04:31 PM
By Kevin Dupont
NBCSports.com news services
Updated: 6:24 p.m. ET July 13, 2005
Well, no need to fret over the need to break a tie. The NHL's collective bargaining agreement has been hammered out — pending ratification by the rank-and-file — and the scoreboard is chock full of winners and losers.

Forget overtime. Forget a shootout. The most acrimonious labor dispute in the history of North American pro sports, which produced the regrettable legacy of the lost 2004-05 season, ultimately delivered a landslide victory for the owners.

For the players? Sweet mother of Maurice Richard, what a beating they took.

Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The players said they would never accept a salary cap. They said linkage, drawing a direct correlation between the league's gross revenues and their outlandish paychecks (average pay of some $1.8 million in the Old World NHL), was absolutely out of the question. In the end, they got a cap, and they also got linkage, and they also got a 24 percent discount on all existing deals.

To borrow a scoring summary from long, long ago, the new CBA has the look of Montreal Canadiens 12, California Golden Seals 1.

The Just Say No Players Association said NO for so long, that when it came time actually to make a deal, as in bargain from intelligence and strength and good faith, the JSNPA was left to do little more than acquiesce to whatever ownership dictated. Oh, and for that, they also surrendered all of their 2004-05 earnings, at least $1 billion.

Little wonder that the Kings' Sean Avery, frustrated and spewing venom in the days leading up to the deal being announced, said he felt he had been "brainwashed" by union boss Bob Goodenow. It was the iron-fisted Goodenow, in the hours leading up to the lockout last September, who bravely reminded owners that it's not wise to challenge hockey players to a fight. That proved to be obsolete thinking — and there's a bit of irony in that, too. For better or worse, fighting became obsolete in the NHL in the early- and mid-90s. In this case, the players chose to pick a fight with logic — ownership's compelling reasons to gain cost certainty — and the harder they fought, they only succeeded in beating themselves into submission.


ALSO ON THIS STORY
NHL, players agree to deal to end lockout
Duff: Whole new game awaits
Vote: Will you return to NHL?



A look at the many winners and losers left standing in the dawn of a new day for the NHL.

Winner: Owners
No more excuses for these guys. If they continue their mad dash to bankruptcy courts across the land, a la the Penguins and Sabres and Senators, they won't be able to point to player payroll as the root cause of their economic bumblings and stumblings.

They entered the lockout behind the unstated battle cry of "Give us cost certainty or give us death," and they damn near got both.

Now they all can make a buck, with payrolls probably capped around $39-40 million, and perhaps more important, they all can expect their franchise equity values to grow. As other sports leagues have seen franchise valuations upwards of $1 billion, or more, members of the Original 30 realized very little appreciation through the '90s and into the new millennium. With salary costs contained, the whole product is far more Forbes-friendly

The_Vulk
07-13-2005, 04:36 PM
The NHL and NHL Players' Association finally announced a deal to end the lockout Wednesday, meaning the league could be back in business as early as next week pending ratification by both sides.

...

It's been a long and tumultuous road towards a resolution. From the first labour meeting in January 2003 to the last on Wednesday, both sides met 82 times over two and a half years before finally agreeing on a new deal.

The lockout wiped out the entire 2004-05 season, including all 1,230 regular-season games, denying hockey fans a Stanley Cup champion for the first time since a flu epidemic cancelled the 1919 final. The NHL became the first major professional league in North America to loose a season from beginning to end because of labour strife.

Once commissioner Gary Bettman announced the season cancelled Feb. 16, both sides returned to the negotiating table March 11 in the first of 44 meetings aimed at making sure the 2005-06 season wouldn't be delayed.

The two sides met every single week starting in early May and didn't let up until the end, cramming in long days in the final six weeks in an effort to finally get it done.
What pisses off alot of fans, is that the negotiations that took place since the 2004-05 seaon was officially cancelled, should have taken place last year!

And all I can say at thgis stage is... ITS ABOUT ****!ng TIME!

GBG BLEED BLUE
07-13-2005, 05:17 PM
What pisses off alot of fans, is that the negotiations that took place since the 2004-05 seaon was officially cancelled, should have taken place last year!

And all I can say at thgis stage is... ITS ABOUT ****!ng TIME!

My thoughts exacly 100% Agreed

Scout
07-13-2005, 06:18 PM
This is what some very respected hockey people have said could or will change the face of the C.H.L. and N.H.L.

So, a $39 million cap with a $21 million floor for 05-06. The cap and floor
float year-to-year, linked to 54% of league revenues. No player may earn more
than 20% of the team cap, meaning for 05-06 there is a maximum player salary
of $7.8 million. A 24% rollback of all existing salaries. Unrestricted free
agency will decrease in age one year at a time until players can become UFA's
at age 27 in 2008.

The UFA age thing is a major victory for the players (allowing them UFA rights
as they enter the 3-4 prime years of their careers), but the rest of the deal
is a big win for the owners. Sure, players can have UFA status earlier, but
they still can't earn as much money as before and the Rangers can't sign every
UFA each year like they have been doing either.

After this thing is ratified next week (players on Tuesday, owners on Thursday
apparently), it's going to be a crazy August as teams start cutting, signing,
and drafting (July 30th in Ottawa apparently) players using the new rules.




__________________________________________________

Scout
07-13-2005, 06:21 PM
Another respected opinion from the hockey circles:

> Hmm. Does this put a hitch in the WHL schedule being released on Aug
> 1st? I would think that they would want to re-look at it, especially
> in Vancouver and Calgary.

I understand that the NHL already has a schedule drawn up for 05-06 but has
been waiting for the CBA to be done before releasing it. If that's the case,
then there shouldn't be any schedule conflicts in Calgary since the Flames
would have reserved dates at the Saddledome for their games and the Hitmen
could
not have scheduled games on those days.

The reality that the NHL will be a radically different business starting in
05-06 though does raise the question of how this might affect the WHL, both
next
year and going forward. Not so much from a playing rules standpoint - although
this will be one of the most obvious effects, if the WHL parrots whatever rule
changes the NHL makes - but from a player personnel standpoint. It's probably
likely that we will see a larger than usual turnover of players in the NHL
next year, as older, higher priced veterans choose to retire rather than play
for drastically reduced salaries, and as middle-of-the-road players (who will
probably take the biggest salary hits %-wise under a cap system) choose to play

for more money in Europe. So, it seems more likely that guys who were drafted
in 2003 or 2004 will be signing with their NHL clubs and be gone, off to fill
the holes in NHL teams' rosters or farm systems. Also, we could see a longer
term effect as well with the reduced entry-level contracts. Rookies can now
sign for a maximum of $850,000 with no performance bonuses and only a 10%
signing bonus. So, signing your high draft picks is now easier and very cheap
(no million-dollar signing bonuses and multi-million performance bonuses to
unproven kids) so I think we'll see NHL teams more willing to sign their new
draftees and put them into the NHL at 19 or even 18 than they were before. At
a maximum of $850,000 they'd be cheaper than a lot of other, older players.

Anyone see other/different possible effects on the WHL?






__________________________________________________ __

Flathead
07-13-2005, 10:15 PM
the Rangers can't sign every
UFA each year like they have been doing either.
_

Just kinda found this funny, thinking that, mabye now they'll actually make the playoffs!! :laugh:

Rooselk
07-15-2005, 01:59 PM
I'm glad the lockout is over and I look forward to seeing games on television this upcoming season. But while I will continue to subscribe to the NHL Center Ice cable package, I did give up my Canucks tickets for Silvertip season tickets and do not regret doing so.

Jimmypop316
07-15-2005, 03:07 PM
It affects the Major Juniors too, they are raising the draft age to 19.

I'm guessing its after the 05-06 campaign since Crosby is going to be the #1 overall this year.