Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Shootout loss

  1. #1

    Default Shootout loss

    Why would they stick Isherwood out in a shoot out ? I don't see he has good hands, he can shoot well. As it limits his options and helps goaltender predictions in this scenario. I think the Tigers have more skill than they believe and will make a decent run in the playoffs if the goaltending is there.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Medicine Hat, Alberta
    Posts
    1,215

    Default

    He probably does well in practices.


    I find when the tigers loose in shootouts they tend to have a couple real bad attempts on net, like last night.

    Although with Eberle in the lineup for the pats, your almost fighting a downhill battle from the get-go.
    MEDICINE HAT TIGERS
    http://tigerturf.blogspot.com/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Regina
    Posts
    4,089

    Default

    Being a Pats fan i have to say i was very surprised on the Pats 1st 3 shooters as well minus Eberle of course.... Strueby & Lefller rnt guys who beat u with dekes they r flat out meat heads who need traffic infront of the net to score.

    I thought the Pats 1st 3 shooters would of been Eberle, Weal & Ashton followed by Gustafsson & Mitchell if needed. I also thought MH was going to kill us in the shootout with the goaltender we had playing, 3 of the 5 goals MH scored during regulation were brutal goals & should of not went in at all.

    From the territorial play & the shots on goal matched the territorial play this game should of been won by the Pats hands down in regulation. Only thing that kept the Tigers in this game was the Pats lack of goaltending due to injuries.

  4. #4

    Default

    So Dubyk wasn't good either, or what you saying?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •