Page 4 of 76 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 14 54 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 753

Thread: Blades regular season chat

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    saskatoon
    Posts
    2,356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whlking View Post
    Andrew Hayes is going to Victoriaville of the QMJHL.
    wouldnt all dub teams have a chance at him first ?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    159

    Default

    You are correct, someone listened in on a conversation where guys were discussing possible opportunities for the 20 year olds and as usually happens missed alot of key points in the conversation. Then, it's grown from there. But yes, a WHL team cannot do a deal with a Q team. The player would have to be released and clear waivers first.

  3. #33

    Default

    Morrison should get a few starts in the next few games to show what he can do for this team.

    With the way Stanford has played this year, I wouldn't hesitate to keep him as one of the 20 year olds.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Saskatoon SK. Canada
    Posts
    753

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whlking View Post
    Andrew Hayes is going to Victoriaville of the QMJHL.
    How do you know this?
    BLEED BLUE

  5. #35

    Default

    I don't know if I agree with keeping Stanford. I think Morrison deserves a chance to show his stuff. Plus, look at how much younger our forwards are this year. By trading Stanford we can free up an overage roster spot for either Acolatse or Boyer, or Patterson (if the Flames are dumb enough not to keep him in the AHL). Sure, our young guys are doing well, but I'd rather keep one of the 3 forwards left.

  6. #36

    Default

    I jus saw on the Flyers website Sunday that they trimmed the roster down, but Morrison's name isn't on the list of players being returned. They still have 5 goalies. ***?

  7. #37

    Default

    I think people forget that Morrison would bring more in a trade then Stanford would, and so would the 20 yr old forwards. why not trade Morrison to say the Bruins who could use a goaltender or maybe even the hitmen since i dont think Snider or Holly will be a good starter for them, just my own opinion and get a veteran forward back.

  8. #38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BladesFan_2010 View Post
    I don't know if I agree with keeping Stanford. I think Morrison deserves a chance to show his stuff. Plus, look at how much younger our forwards are this year. By trading Stanford we can free up an overage roster spot for either Acolatse or Boyer, or Patterson (if the Flames are dumb enough not to keep him in the AHL). Sure, our young guys are doing well, but I'd rather keep one of the 3 forwards left.
    i agree the young guys are holding there own...but we havent had a good test yet...we havent played a top team yet...lets see how they do then.

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BladesFan_2010 View Post
    I don't know if I agree with keeping Stanford. I think Morrison deserves a chance to show his stuff. Plus, look at how much younger our forwards are this year. By trading Stanford we can free up an overage roster spot for either Acolatse or Boyer, or Patterson (if the Flames are dumb enough not to keep him in the AHL). Sure, our young guys are doing well, but I'd rather keep one of the 3 forwards left.
    Thats why u trade Morrison for a veteran forward. I'm sure a team that needs a goaltender would cough one up. All your going to get for Stanford is a pick.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Posts
    243

    Default

    What's wrong with that? Lorne has many picks, he's thinking about the future too and has a lot of faith in his scouts. Whatever he chooses to do is more than likely the right thing for the team.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •