Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 119

Thread: 2011 WHL Draft

  1. #101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZAMBONI-PHONEY View Post
    The Hurricanes were talking about Wong during the Alberta Cup. When I talked to BR he said that Wong could be one of those later round steals. They also have their eyes on a player from LA, maybe he is next.

    Alberta Cup is a good showcase of talent. Just looking at the list of players
    on the teams that played here. 12 were taken in the 1st round, 4 were taken in the 2nd round, 6 were taken in the 3rd round, 8 were taken in the 4th round and 3 were chosen in the 5th round.

    So far after 5 rounds the winning team Calgary South Flames had the most selected (9) including 4 in the 1st round.

    Hit the road Jack!

    Absolutely Wong could be a late round steal but he could be a total miss. I just wonder if he still had some sliding to do before. The kid has buckets of potential to play on I am just not sure I am sold on his will. That drive and determination can mean a lot but it can also mean jack. Hey Ryan Getzlaf was a late round pick up too.

    Alberta really has stepped up its competitive level of late. Really producing a lot of great players and this year was a fantastic showcase all season. Some really great teams and great competition. That Calgary South team was like the dream team. All season teams in the South had nightmares of what would happen if the Royals and Bisons combined. I am glad I didn't have to try and line match that group. Interesting to me that a player like Josh McCulloh has slipped so far down. I think if you had the opportunity to see AMBHL games this year you really got a treat to some great talent. There are still some very good Alberta players on the outside looking in right now.

  2. #102

    Default Pilon

    Interesting thing about our 1st pick, Ryan Pilon, is that he is one of the youngest players chosen in the entire draft. He is a late birthday of Oct 10 1996. If you go to Alan Caldwell's blog he explains the significance of being a late birthdate player.

    "Overall, 62% of draft picks were born in the first four months (33%) of the year 1996. You can see what a disadvantage the boys born in the last third of the year (10.3% of picks) had against the bigger, older boys from the early months. This happens every year" http://smallatlarge.blogspot.com/

    Pilon is almost a full year younger than our 2nd pick, Reid Duke. At their age, one year can make a huge difference in the players physical and mental maturity. For Pilon to be that young and be taken that high shows what a huge upside this kid has. If he was born about 10 weeks later he would not even have been eligible for this draft.
    If I have my facts correct, another positive to his late birthday is he will not be eligible for the NHL draft until 2015. All the other players the Canes chose will be eligible in the 2014 NHL draft. What this means is in all likelihood, Pilon will be here for an extra year. For example, RNH can be gone to the NHL after just 2 years in the league where Pilon will be here at least 3 years. Zach Boychuk was not drafted until he had played 3 fulls years for the Canes as he to had an October birthdate.
    An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.

  3. #103

    Default what will we do at the import draft ?

    We already know that we will for sure have room for 1 player and maybe 2 if our Russian player does not return? If you were the GM do we trade away that choice for a younger player or do we continue to look for a draft pick in the bantam draft for next year. Or perhaps bundle that choice with a player or players who we will most likely have to trade if we are going to create some space for the 1993,1994 or 1995 born players. Also what our your thoughts on Fyten,Braes,or Sutter are any of them going to so impress at NHL camps that they get sent to the AHL or ECHL for development rather then return to us ? Lets hear your reflections on these developments

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    lethbridge
    Posts
    1,082

    Default to me, i would say.................

    Quote Originally Posted by grainbear View Post
    We already know that we will for sure have room for 1 player and maybe 2 if our Russian player does not return? If you were the GM do we trade away that choice for a younger player or do we continue to look for a draft pick in the bantam draft for next year. Or perhaps bundle that choice with a player or players who we will most likely have to trade if we are going to create some space for the 1993,1994 or 1995 born players. Also what our your thoughts on Fyten,Braes,or Sutter are any of them going to so impress at NHL camps that they get sent to the AHL or ECHL for development rather then return to us ? Lets hear your reflections on these developments
    bundle up the top import draft with as you say a player that will be on the way out of town for sure ( most likly a dman) and trade for a player that can help up front this coming year....as for our o/a players the only one that i could see staying in the big league would be sutter and that would be completely based on the name on his jersey, and nothing else.....personally i hope all 3 of our 20's return for their last year of jr...........ps.............it would be nice to see kuv come back and play if given the ice time he deserves, he is a big assest when he is on top of his game, but old rich seem to have it in 4 him so who knows......................
    GO CANES GO.................

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lethbridge
    Posts
    1,364

    Default

    Pilon sounds even better, HR. Leverton is one prospect that intrigues me the most. Really looking forward to see how he develops. It's starting to hit home now how many top end players I won't see play 36 or more times a year. The Canes cupboard is starting to overflow. One more dreadful year and they will be the envy of the league for 4 or 5 years.
    "I promise that we will put an exciting fast paced product on the ice each and every game and bring back the winning tradition to Lethbridge." Berehowsky

    Cycle Cycle and then pass it to Michael!

  6. #106

    Default Did some homework

    This is looking at the current roster and drafted players, removed those traded and added those we have picked up. Interesting to see the results, it kind of shows how poorly we did when our formed gm was here before Preston and Robinson came on board,


    1992 We look much better on d because of the changes made since the new g-man and Robinson came on board

    the first number is the position drafted out of the total pool by that position.
    D-Men
    Pick Number: 17,19,38,42 out of 80 (first 3 are by trade)
    Center;
    47,55 out of 59
    RW: 2,25 out of 33 (2 pick by trade)
    LW: 7,24 out of 46
    G: 5 th of 22

    1993
    D-Men: 12,22,30,67 out of 72
    Center 8,46,59,60 out of 61
    RW: 12 out of 37
    LW: 34 out of 36
    G: 14 out of 18

    1994
    D-Men: 21,38,78,79 out of 80
    Center: 20,36.47 out of 66
    RW: 15 out of 31
    LW: 1,10 out of 36
    G: 0 out of 20

    1995
    D-Men 13,20,31,74 out of 86
    Center: 3,11 out of 41
    RW: 10 out of 22
    LW: 13 out of 23
    Fwd: 8,11 out of 24
    G: 7 out of 33

    1996
    D-Men: 2,17,27,41 out of 70
    Center: 1,12 out of 51
    RW: 15 out of 31
    LW: 1,10 out of 51
    G: 12 out of 20

    I certainly looks good for the future, I did not look at 1991 as we can only keep 3 players. A lot coming up this year will be how fast these younger talented players can step up to this level, You also add in the youngsters like Soffilas, Ramsay ,Kuvaev , and Kovacs and things are looking upward from free agency and Import and then our 12 pick over all for the import this year and let the games begin

  7. #107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HURRICANE'S ROCK View Post
    Interesting thing about our 1st pick, Ryan Pilon, is that he is one of the youngest players chosen in the entire draft. He is a late birthday of Oct 10 1996. If you go to Alan Caldwell's blog he explains the significance of being a late birthdate player.

    "Overall, 62% of draft picks were born in the first four months (33%) of the year 1996. You can see what a disadvantage the boys born in the last third of the year (10.3% of picks) had against the bigger, older boys from the early months. This happens every year" http://smallatlarge.blogspot.com/

    Pilon is almost a full year younger than our 2nd pick, Reid Duke. At their age, one year can make a huge difference in the players physical and mental maturity. For Pilon to be that young and be taken that high shows what a huge upside this kid has. If he was born about 10 weeks later he would not even have been eligible for this draft.
    If I have my facts correct, another positive to his late birthday is he will not be eligible for the NHL draft until 2015. All the other players the Canes chose will be eligible in the 2014 NHL draft. What this means is in all likelihood, Pilon will be here for an extra year. For example, RNH can be gone to the NHL after just 2 years in the league where Pilon will be here at least 3 years. Zach Boychuk was not drafted until he had played 3 fulls years for the Canes as he to had an October birthdate.
    You are on to something Rock. Read Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers". Has an interesting take on players born in the first third of the year. Right down to Jan 12 passes to Feb 8 back to March 10 in the high slot and a blistering shot stopped by Feb 22. He runs thru some goals of a Memorial Cup game between the Giants and the Tigers. Your right Pilon is a year behind the others.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lethbridge
    Posts
    1,364

    Default

    I wonder how the prep for a Mem Cup bid is coming along? Any update?
    "I promise that we will put an exciting fast paced product on the ice each and every game and bring back the winning tradition to Lethbridge." Berehowsky

    Cycle Cycle and then pass it to Michael!

  9. #109

    Default what to see our prospects ?

    Get on the Small Thoughts at Large web site and get your vote in right now it looks like I am the only one to vote, He does all the teams but the vote determines who comes first. Lets step up Canes fans

  10. Default June.....

    Quote Originally Posted by Bocephus View Post
    I wonder how the prep for a Mem Cup bid is coming along? Any update?
    The WHL powers-at-be will be making a decision this month to whittle down the list of bidding teams by one or two. There are five teams (Calgary has withdrawn) bidding for the Mem Cup. PG, RD, Kel, Sask, Leth. They will likely trim down to 3 or 4 left to make the formal bids. Consensus being that PG will likely be dropped and maybe one other. I would not be surprised if the Hurricanes were dumped also, as there are two major concerns.....the weakness of the team over the last two seasons, a young team again this coming season, improving for 2012-13 but not enough to be at or near the top of the league, without making huge deals (not Preston's approach). Considering what was given up for Eakin and Schenn....not going to happen here. The other concern is the financial situation and season ticket base.

    If the Hurricanes are not going to get the bid for those reasons, then I hope they get cut in June. It takes a lot of man-hours and money to prepare a formal bid. I really think it will come down to RD and Sask. Private ownership, solid teams, strong season ticket base.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •