Originally Posted by
hockey4
I think part of the success of the program developing players for pro hockey is the accountability and maturing process the players need to go through. The paper wanted to do an article on Pawlenchuk, probably asked why his year has been inconsistent, so Sutter answered it. This happens with every coach, everywhere.
In regards to the 16 year old comment, he probably made those exact remarks to the team after the game haha. Once again, in every sport, on every team, there comes a time when young players come in and push for roster spots when veterans struggles. creates competition, its healthy. Sounds like you have a more permanent dislike to Sutter, my comments wont change your mind.
Good win tonight. I've had really no major issues with how the team has played the last 2-3 weeks, save for 2-3 games. There were games they lost where they deserved to win, just were having trouble putting the puck in the net. On the whole, it hasn't been 2-3 weeks of ****ty effort, just ****ty finishing haha. It's impossible to not notice the difference when 2 of your top 9 forwards are out though. The team has depth up front, but over 40 goals out of your lineup for those 3 players is over 20% of the years total, tough to magically find a bunch of offense elsewhere. All in all, nice to see them rewarded, they have been playing much better.