What do you think?
Yay
Nay
What do you think?
I didn't care for it. It seemed to turn into a competiton between the two ref's calling the game. There were way more penalties called and alot were marginal. I like the one ref system and the linseman having the authority to call the real major infractions.
Scout
The WHL referee pool is shallow enough. We don't need to dive in deeper.
It did seem to be more calls and a competition between the two, and spending more money is probly another factor for some of the poorer teams.Originally Posted by Scout
KELOWNA ROCKETS 2004 MEMORIAL CUP CHAMPIONS!
http://cropcircle.ca/forums/index.php
Agreed. With the two ref system you're just bringing in 26 refs who are not ready to step into the WHL.Originally Posted by witness
I think we should have to 2 ref system for the playoffs. Last year there was too much at stake to have idiot Matsuoka (sp) missing calls.
I take pride in not owning a cowbell!
That was the point. It's part of the whole crackdown on obstruction...to call the little things that nobody really sees. The problem with the 2-referee system is that it frankly costs too much money for the league.Originally Posted by Scout
That "idiot" is going to the World Championship, and not for the first time either.Originally Posted by ihlemic10
Well then he is a consistant idiot.
I take pride in not owning a cowbell!